Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    The Gunstringer

    Game » consists of 5 releases. Released Sep 19, 2011

    When betrayed and left to die by his posse, the undead Gunstringer seeks revenge in this marionette-inspired Kinect rail shooter.

    fabiosooner's The Gunstringer (Xbox 360) review

    Avatar image for fabiosooner
    • Score:
    • fabiosooner wrote this review on .
    • 12 out of 114 Giant Bomb users found it helpful.
    • This review received 45 comments

    Wii shovelware disguised in 'core gamer sensibilities'

    Take a collection of Wii minigames - not the Wii Sports fun variety, but of the shovelware 'tradition' - give it a coat of paint of 'weird' humor, release it as an independent company and you have The Gunstringer: a game that's idiotic in all levels possible but critics and 'core' gamers will praise just because they want to 'support the small guy' (not to mention justify the fact they did bought Kinect but are too lazy to use it to play what it's generally best for, dancing and sports/exercise games).

    Don't believe the hype: this game no different from what most 'core' gamers have come to expect from Wii/Kinect/Move shovelware minigame collections. It's totally on rails, it's gimmicky and it tries to rely on the idea of 'making gaming fun' by removing any kind of challenge or depth. Just an example, wherever else you would get to play platform sections *on-rails*, just flicking your arm up to jump? And no, the jump doesn't even change much according to your movements - just flick a little to jump high and far enough to cover three times the longest distance needed. You'll only fall if Kinect doesn't read your gesture properly. Even 8-bit games had more depth than this.

    Worse yet, it doesn't do anything with Kinect that better games, such as Child of Eden or Rise of Nightmares, haven't done before. It just hides behind 'innovations' such as using real actors as if they were 'watching' the game unfold in a theater, spurting uncensored humor, and the promise that you can play it sitting on the couch. And, of course, the aforementioned fact that it's been made by an indie company, which makes people *way* more forgiving then they'd be otherwise if this was, say, the exact same game but for the Wii and made by Hudson or Ubisoft. The only real upsides to the game are the controls, which work very well, but even then it's hard to give it much credit since they're absurdly simple - that is, the game doesn't really go the distance to use Kinect such as Rise of Nightmares or even Kinect Sports did. And they aren't as precise as, say, the controls in Fruit Ninja Kinect.

    What's even more annoying is that the game tries so hard to be funny that just ends up being silly. There's a difference between crazy, out-there humor such as in Shadows of the Damned, and what Gunstringer tries to do when it shows a grown cowboy stickin' it into a giant alligator; it's not toilet/dick humor, it's 10-year-old-giggling-at-porno-magazines humor. It's the same difference between the lifeless, stale humor in Duke Nukem Forever and the riotous dick jokes in Bulletstorm.

    Which says a lot about how the industry, even its indie side, views 'core' gamers: as complete idiots who will never grow up. And in part they're right, given how this trainwreck of a 'game' is being received by so-called 'trusted' gaming portals around. It's sad to notice how platform wars and political ideologies have trumpled people's best judgements. But time will show how Gunstringer is forgettable; once the need to 'support the small guy no matter the crap it makes' dwindles off, which inevitably happens, people will notice that this is nothing like the games that made the indie market a reality, such as Limbo or Braid. It's as much a cheap cash-in as any mainstream game made to quickly tap on the huge Kinect install base while the peripheral is still hot, and it's even more shameful at it for trying to reinforce the basement-dweller, anti-social stereotype of 'core' gamer at the same time.

    Just wait and see how many one- and two-star user reviews will pop up in here in a year, when loads of people start to buy it for $5 in bargain bins and come here to ask 'how the heck this game got praised?'. At least they'll get Fruit Ninja Kinect for half the price...

    45 Comments

    Avatar image for pitta
    Pitta

    222

    Forum Posts

    633

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Pitta

    I disagree.

    Avatar image for captainlemon
    CaptainLemon

    9

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By CaptainLemon

    "Just wait and see how many user reviews with scores below 6 will pop up in here in a year"

    Every review on this website is below 6

    Avatar image for guypussy
    guypussy

    30

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By guypussy

    This "review" is solely based on your watching the Quick Look, isn't it?

    Avatar image for fabiosooner
    fabiosooner

    16

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By fabiosooner

    @guypussysaid:

    This "review" is solely based on your watching the Quick Look, isn't it?

    Oh, suuure. How much did you pay that shady private investigator to break in and install that hidden cam in my living room?

    Gotta love how quickly people jump to conclusions when they read someone disagreeing with them. Now, if someone could so kindly offer any kind of real counterpoint, such as trying to explain how insightful it is to design on-rails platform sections with only one command... It'd be lovely. But I'm not that hopeful.

    Avatar image for fabiosooner
    fabiosooner

    16

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By fabiosooner

    @CaptainLemon: @CaptainLemon said:

    "Just wait and see how many user reviews with scores below 6 will pop up in here in a year"

    Every review on this website is below 6

    Oops, my fault. That's what I get for writing the same review for two different portals. Of course I meant below 6 out of 10, and updated the review accordingly to 'one- and two-star reviews'.

    But that's after some time. Right now, people obviously will not see it, because they've fallen for the hype as much as I (very regrettably) did when I bought this 'game'.

    Avatar image for deusoma
    Deusoma

    3224

    Forum Posts

    128696

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 4

    Edited By Deusoma

    High five for not being afraid to speak your mind, duder.

    Avatar image for metalbaofu
    MetalBaofu

    1710

    Forum Posts

    1270

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 15

    Edited By MetalBaofu

    @fabiosooner said:

    Gotta love how quickly people jump to conclusions when they read someone disagreeing with them.

    You mean exactly like you are doing when you suggest no one could actually like this game, and it's just blind indie praise?

    Avatar image for lockeyness
    lockeyness

    233

    Forum Posts

    8618

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 5

    Edited By lockeyness

    Less a review on the game itself and more of a rambling diatribe directed at people who would enjoy such a game. Read: Trolling.

    Avatar image for vibratingdonkey
    vibratingdonkey

    1238

    Forum Posts

    1219

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By vibratingdonkey

    It's short and the mechanics are really simple, but it works and is decently entertaining. The gameplay isn't really what's appealing about this game though.

    I suppose the humor isn't for everyone, but that's the primary allure of it for me. Twisted Pixel is a very silly group of people. And sexy.

    Think I'll purchase it at some point.

    Avatar image for bisonhero
    BisonHero

    12796

    Forum Posts

    625

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By BisonHero

    @metalhead87 said:

    @fabiosooner said:

    Gotta love how quickly people jump to conclusions when they read someone disagreeing with them.

    You mean exactly like you are doing when you suggest no one could actually like this game, and it's just blind indie praise?

    Exactly.

    fabiosooner is entitled to his negative opinion on the game, but broadly stereotyping anyone who likes the game is childish. Or clairvoyancy.

    It's a review. You say your piece about the game, and leave. At no point is it appropriate to go off on a tangent about how much you despise "the hype", gaming sites, or gamers. None of those things should have anything to do with your qualitative experience with the game.

    Avatar image for example1013
    Example1013

    4854

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Example1013

    So HD, and yet so anti-HD at the same exact time.

    Avatar image for euandewar
    EuanDewar

    5159

    Forum Posts

    136

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By EuanDewar

    @Example1013 said:

    So HD, and yet so anti-HD at the same exact time.

    I'd like to think HD would be more sophisticated than this. Or at least more obtusely offensive.

    Avatar image for fabiosooner
    fabiosooner

    16

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By fabiosooner

    @metalhead87: @metalhead87 said:

    @fabiosooner said:

    Gotta love how quickly people jump to conclusions when they read someone disagreeing with them.

    You mean exactly like you are doing when you suggest no one could actually like this game, and it's just blind indie praise?

    Except that I actually coupled it with an example of the kind of level/gameplay design the game offers, with just one action/command. That is, I'm pointing out how such a section would be readily be considered a travesty in other circumstances, and I'm offering a possibility for this disparity of opinion - indie goodwill.

    Meanwhile, no one offered any evidence towards me reviewing it based on a Quick Look. Huge difference.

    Avatar image for example1013
    Example1013

    4854

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Example1013

    @EuanDewar said:

    @Example1013 said:

    So HD, and yet so anti-HD at the same exact time.

    I'd like to think HD would be more sophisticated than this. Or at least more obtusely offensive.

    Well, it's the sentiment that he hates the game and everyone who plays it, but for the opposite reasons that HD would. HD would hate the game if it had "better" core gameplay mechanics, because then the rest of the game (story, entertainment, amusement) would be utter shit, like every Wii game ever.

    Avatar image for euandewar
    EuanDewar

    5159

    Forum Posts

    136

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By EuanDewar

    @Example1013: Yeah but the peripheral stuff that makes HD's posts special isn't in here. It needs to be more violently seething with venom for people.

    Still, fucking hilarious.

    Avatar image for fabiosooner
    fabiosooner

    16

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By fabiosooner

    @Lockeyness said:

    Less a review on the game itself and more of a rambling diatribe directed at people who would enjoy such a game. Read: Trolling.

    You're entitled to your opinion. But for me, no game is devoid of context. The context here is that the game doesn't do anything differently than other motion-controlled games released in the past, but somehow it has been treated like it does. It's hard not to notice the disparity of treatment and suspect it has to do with extra factors.

    Of course, it's easier to ignore the comments on the level design, on the gameplay and the kind of humor it features - all of which I have clear examples of - and just point at me the same accusation I'm making. Or worse, to say I'm trolling. It's like when you see someone cheating in poker, call it for what it is, and the person starts to call *you* a cheater just to deflect blame.

    No one that came here to defend this game have provided a single example of anything this game does in its level design or gameplay that's novel or appropriate to Kinect, for example. Tell me of a section of the game that made you click *okay, I have not seen this before* or even *ok, I can approach this section in 5 different ways*. I'm willing to review my position if someone IS capable of doing that. I'll be waiting.

    Avatar image for metalbaofu
    MetalBaofu

    1710

    Forum Posts

    1270

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 15

    Edited By MetalBaofu

    @fabiosooner said:

    @metalhead87: @metalhead87 said:

    @fabiosooner said:

    Gotta love how quickly people jump to conclusions when they read someone disagreeing with them.

    You mean exactly like you are doing when you suggest no one could actually like this game, and it's just blind indie praise?

    Except that I actually coupled it with an example of the kind of level/gameplay design the game offers, with just one action/command. That is, I'm pointing out how such a section would be readily be considered a travesty in other circumstances, and I'm offering a possibility for this disparity of opinion - indie goodwill.

    Meanwhile, no one offered any evidence towards me reviewing it based on a Quick Look. Huge difference.

    I didn't say anything about you basing the review on a quick look. That has nothing to do with what I said. For all I know you did buy the game and didn't like it at all, like you said. That doesn't change the fact that you are jumping to some conclusion that no one could genuinely like the game.

    Avatar image for deliciousbees
    deliciousbees

    48

    Forum Posts

    2656

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Edited By deliciousbees

    "Except that I actually coupled it with an example of the kind of level/gameplay design the game offers, with just one action/command. "

    You're talking about the Donkey Kong/Canabalt platforming sections, of which there's probably about 5 minutes of all up in the game (Western Act 1, Bayou Act 2 and 3, Samurai Act 1). Judging by your Raptr profile, you only played the demo, which has Bayou Act 2 in it, which might be skewing your perception of how much is in the final game.

    It's okay if you don't like that, every part of the game (or even the whole game) isn't for everyone. Claiming that it's representative of the majority of the game is stretching it a bit too far. Getting so pissed off over 5 minutes of gameplay in a game that you post the same one star review on Giant Bomb, Metacritic, and probably a few other sites too is probably something that's worth evaluating in your life, though.

    Avatar image for thetenthdoctor
    thetenthdoctor

    323

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By thetenthdoctor

    Why do you use "on rails" as a pejorative? Panzer Dragoon Orta, Sin & Punishment and Radiant Silvergun are three examples of great games that are "on rails" and still awesome, and neither of those mixes up the gameplay with cover shooting sections or jumping.

    There are always going to be inherent differences between the amount of control freedom in a Kinect game versus a controller game, but there's nothing wrong with that. Child of Eden and Gunstringer put a new, unique and fun spin on the classic on rails shooter thanks to the Kinect controls.

    I honestly dont understand the comparison to Wii shovelware, since auto scrolling or on rails shooters have been around for years, long before motion controls. I'm not saying you're "wrong", because it's impossible for an opinion to be wrong- just that you shouldn't expect every game to offer the same depth of interface options as a dual joystick FPS.

    Avatar image for fabiosooner
    fabiosooner

    16

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By fabiosooner

    @Deusoma said:

    High five for not being afraid to speak your mind, duder.

    Thanks. It's a dirty job but someone's got to do it.

    I wish people noticed that I'm not attacking core gamers in general or even those who actually liked this game, but the disparity of treatment and goodwill people can direct towards certain games but not others.

    Imagine a level in Super Mario Bros where everything sidescrolls automatically and you don't need to do a thing except pushing a single button way before the platform you're walking in ends, or a Playstation Move shooter game where you just move the stick from side to side to strafe and flick the Move forward to shoot - and nothing else. No other actions, no other possibilities, no other commands. If someone finds this fun, more power to them. I'm not attacking these people. I'm attacking those who wouldn't find these examples any fun at all, but still say that Gunstringer is any different, because it isn't. The examples I've given describe perfectly the gameplay in some platform and shooting sections of the game. You like it, play the hell of it, it's your right. Heck, Fruit Ninja Kinect is almost as simple as this and I still play it. Just don't try and fool people into believing the gameplay has any depth beyond, say, The Shoot or House of the Dead: Overkill, because there's actually less to do.

    Avatar image for unrealdp
    UnrealDP

    1342

    Forum Posts

    1908

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By UnrealDP

    Christ, you think this game will get good reviews because of its indie roots? First of all this game isn't seen as indie it's big budget kinect title is you look at the line up. Oh and second your theory has already been disproven with the scrutinizing reviews of Comic Jumper and Ms.Splosion Man. Some might even say that Brad was too critical in his review and i'm sure if you had looked at this stuff already (ya know research) you would have seen your theory destroyed before your vary eyes.

    As for the opinion expressed in your review, we are all entitled to our own opinions, but i strongly disagree with yours.

    Avatar image for megalowho
    megalowho

    1148

    Forum Posts

    4888

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 29

    Edited By megalowho

    I respect your opinion on Gunstringer but don't really like your review style. It's pretty combative and uses the game as a jumping off point for getting things off your chest about reviewers, independent developers, Kinect owners, etc. You'll get a more reasoned response if you focus your writing on the experience in the box itself next time, and save the rest for a blog. Would have been nice to include an opinion on the Wavy Tube Man Chronicles too, as that's probably the part of the game I'm most interested in reading about.

    Avatar image for nail1080
    nail1080

    2025

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By nail1080

    Good review, you see the game for what it is. Pity Ryan Davis is starting to lose the plot a bit

    Avatar image for xeirus
    Xeirus

    1729

    Forum Posts

    418

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By Xeirus

    @DeliciousBees said:

    Getting so pissed off over 5 minutes of gameplay in a game that you post the same one star review on Giant Bomb, Metacritic, and probably a few other sites too is probably something that's worth evaluating in your life, though.

    I lol'd so hard, so true. Someone expected different from a Kinect game, sigh.

    Avatar image for huey2k2
    Huey2k2

    528

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Huey2k2

    First review ever and it's a 1star rant.

    Clearly not trolling at all.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5f4ff4bd25123
    deactivated-5f4ff4bd25123

    17

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    How did you review the game, yet have no Gunstringer achievements on your xbox live account? I'd suggest playing the games before you offer reviews to others.

    Avatar image for milkman
    Milkman

    19372

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    Edited By Milkman

    This guy has no achievements in the Gunstringer. Hmm....

    Avatar image for mormonwarrior
    MormonWarrior

    2945

    Forum Posts

    577

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 21

    Edited By MormonWarrior

    As opposed to the safe comments given by several people here, I have to say: one star is entirely too low for this game. I can tell that just by watching video of it. I don't like the Twisted Pixel games at all and have no interest in buying or defending this game, but it is an entirely competent, budget-priced game that has a decent sense of style and humor about it. It works, it has content, and that immediately puts it AT BARE MINIMUM at a 2 Star. One is reserved for broken, buggy, thrown-together garbage that shouldn't be on shelves and brother, this ain't that. Opinions CAN be, and often are, wrong. Thank you.

    EDIT: Example, I really really hate Half-Life 2. An awful lot. I don't understand why anybody likes it. But I can recognize that there are a lot of key components that work in it, the game has a unique flow to it and there is some stuff that is pretty innovative, I guess. I wouldn't dream of giving it lower than three stars.

    Avatar image for cambot3000
    cambot3000

    19

    Forum Posts

    64

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 12

    Edited By cambot3000

    Thank you. So tired of reviews of Twisted Pixel games that boil down to "It isn't very good, but it's ironic, so four stars!"

    Avatar image for theuselessgod
    theuselessgod

    339

    Forum Posts

    476

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 20

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By theuselessgod

    Just played it for three hours. You are completely wrong. And your arrogant way of presenting it only further proves your trolling. You can dislike the game, sure, but blaming others for liking it because its "quirky" or "independent" is just straight up rude.

    I thought the GB community was better than that. I guess not.

    Avatar image for mario2544
    Mario2544

    106

    Forum Posts

    50

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    Edited By Mario2544

    This review talked in no depth about anything other than the controls.

    It read like "The controls are simple, although people will rate this game highly because it's funny and witty and has good atmosphere it's controls suck and it's sad that I'm the only word of reason in this world...1/5 stars"

    It sounds like you just may become the Armond White of video games.

    Avatar image for ballblaster
    ballblaster

    89

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By ballblaster

    Lol this a a fake Troll review. His XBL profile shows he hasn't even played the full game.

    Avatar image for generic_username
    generic_username

    943

    Forum Posts

    1494

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 7

    Edited By generic_username
    @Huey2k2 said:

    First review ever and it's a 1star rant.

    Clearly not trolling at all.


    And he's never played the game. And he's only replying to comments from the people who are falling for it, not the ones pointing out that he hasn't played it. I just hope Giantbomb's community doesn't turn into 1up. I really don't like it there.
    Avatar image for thesoutherndandy
    TheSouthernDandy

    4157

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By TheSouthernDandy

    @cambot3000 said:

    Thank you. So tired of reviews of Twisted Pixel games that boil down to "It isn't very good, but it's ironic, so four stars!"

    Soooo I take it you've decided to just ignore the review for Ms. Splosion man?

    I didn't read anywhere in Ryan's review that said something along those lines...I might have missed something but he seemed to enjoy playing the game as well as the humor.

    Avatar image for mindchamber
    MindChamber

    414

    Forum Posts

    68

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By MindChamber

    Mehh, you're probably right, but I dont like your tone, and youre not fun to read.

    so yah, Ill pass on your reviews from now one, the worlds is too full of nasty.

    I like me game reviews fun and lighthearted, even the negative ones. laters.

    Avatar image for tadthuggish
    TadThuggish

    1074

    Forum Posts

    334

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 41

    Edited By TadThuggish

    @Milkman said:

    This guy has no achievements in the Gunstringer. Hmm....

    Avatar image for syzygyeolith
    syzygyeolith

    114

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By syzygyeolith

    Protip: If you don't want people to think you're a stupid troll, don't rate a functional, polished, and obviously well liked party game 'one star'.

    Also, you sound like a barrel of laughs.

    Avatar image for iamjohn
    iamjohn

    6297

    Forum Posts

    13905

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    Edited By iamjohn

    Yes, I'm sure this review published the same day the fucking game came out is bound to be insightful, measured and not scream of someone rushing to beat a game and then writing an angry screed for some reason.

    Avatar image for lockeyness
    lockeyness

    233

    Forum Posts

    8618

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 5

    Edited By lockeyness

    @fabiosooner said:

    @Lockeyness said:

    Less a review on the game itself and more of a rambling diatribe directed at people who would enjoy such a game. Read: Trolling.

    You're entitled to your opinion. But for me, no game is devoid of context. The context here is that the game doesn't do anything differently than other motion-controlled games released in the past, but somehow it has been treated like it does. It's hard not to notice the disparity of treatment and suspect it has to do with extra factors.

    Of course, it's easier to ignore the comments on the level design, on the gameplay and the kind of humor it features - all of which I have clear examples of - and just point at me the same accusation I'm making. Or worse, to say I'm trolling. It's like when you see someone cheating in poker, call it for what it is, and the person starts to call *you* a cheater just to deflect blame.

    No one that came here to defend this game have provided a single example of anything this game does in its level design or gameplay that's novel or appropriate to Kinect, for example. Tell me of a section of the game that made you click *okay, I have not seen this before* or even *ok, I can approach this section in 5 different ways*. I'm willing to review my position if someone IS capable of doing that. I'll be waiting.

    No.

    Avatar image for ax23000
    Ax23000

    32

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Ax23000

    "I'm attacking those who wouldn't find these examples any fun at all, but still say that Gunstringer is any different, because it isn't."

    The problem with this is that you're trying to pin down something that can't really be pinned down. Maybe someone wouldn't enjoy on-rails Mario, but WOULD enjoy Gunstringer. That's their right. You can't declare there is no difference. For YOU there might not be, but for others there might be. It's not your place as a reviewer to tell people what to like or to pick on a certain audience or group of people. Stick to reviewing the game. Context is fine to a certain extent. For example it's fair to bring up the context of how the game started as a downloadable title. Or it might be fair to talk about casual games (as you do) and how the game fits with that movement.

    But it ultimately isn't your place to attack anyone in a review. Really you shouldn't even attack the developer IMO. Attacking people accomplishes nothing, isn't very nice, and just in general isn't a great way to go about living life.

    Avatar image for atomicedge
    AtomicEdge

    373

    Forum Posts

    5339

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 11

    Edited By AtomicEdge

    Hang on, you substituted "6/10" for "1 and 2 star reviews"? Surely 6/10 would equal 3 Stars?

    Avatar image for musclerider
    musclerider

    897

    Forum Posts

    6

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By musclerider

    Try playing the full game before writing a review, jackass.

    Avatar image for coombs
    Coombs

    3509

    Forum Posts

    587

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    Edited By Coombs
    No Caption Provided

    ...seems to be something missing from Fabiosooners recent games,

    But you have to give the guy credit,

    He must be an amazing reviewer to have been able to review the entire game,

    Considering he hasn't played it.

    Avatar image for aperturesilence
    ApertureSilence

    1184

    Forum Posts

    39

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 9

    Edited By ApertureSilence

    @fabiosooner said:

    @guypussysaid:

    This "review" is solely based on your watching the Quick Look, isn't it?

    Oh, suuure. How much did you pay that shady private investigator to break in and install that hidden cam in my living room?

    I love how defensive you're being, considering that you don't have The Gunstringer in your Achievement history at all.

    Don't need no private investigator to see you're a stinking liar.

    Avatar image for hs21
    HS21

    2731

    Forum Posts

    498

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    Edited By HS21

    @Example1013 said:

    @EuanDewar said:

    @Example1013 said:

    So HD, and yet so anti-HD at the same exact time.

    I'd like to think HD would be more sophisticated than this. Or at least more obtusely offensive.

    Well, it's the sentiment that he hates the game and everyone who plays it, but for the opposite reasons that HD would. HD would hate the game if it had "better" core gameplay mechanics, because then the rest of the game (story, entertainment, amusement) would be utter shit, like every Wii game ever.

    HD would probably at least play the game before reviewing it.

    Other reviews for The Gunstringer (Xbox 360)

      The Gunstringer Is Breezy, Colorful Fun While It Lasts 0

      Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I've never had as much reverence for indie developer Twisted Pixel as everyone else seems to. I found their debut effort, The Maw, to be downright boring, and while the 'Splosion Man games have a certain delirious charm to them the gameplay never drew me in. My favorite of their games, Comic Jumper, seems to be their least appreciated. So when it was announced that they'd be developing a new game for Kinect, I was doubly uninterested. But after receiving a Kin...

      1 out of 1 found this review helpful.

      Solid Game Worth the Money 0

      About two summers ago if you asked me if I was going to get the new Twisted Pixel game I would have probably said “eh maybe.” But after time with their newer games Twisted pixel has landed on my list of favorite indie developers and all The Gunstringer does is seal the deal.The well-narrated story of the Gunstringer tells the story of a slick marionette outlaw brought back to life in order to inflict deadly revenge on his gang members that betrayed him. The Gunstringers gang of five each has the...

      1 out of 1 found this review helpful.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.